“Everybody is a genius. But if you judge a fish by its ability to climb a tree, it will live its whole life believing that it is stupid”.
When Marks Become Identity
In today’s education system, marks, ranks, and percentages are increasingly becoming the measure of a student’s worth. From school classrooms to competitive examinations like JEE, NEET, UPSC, and CUET, students are often conditioned to believe that success is determined by numerical performance rather than actual understanding or creativity. This culture of rank obsession has transformed education into a race where comparison often matters more than learning itself.
Recognizing this issue, the National Education Policy (NEP) 2020 emphasized the need to shift from rote learning and exam-centric education toward holistic learning, critical thinking, and skill development. The policy itself acknowledges that India’s education system has focused excessively on memorization and board examination performance instead of conceptual clarity and multidisciplinary growth.
The Mental Health Crisis Behind Ranks
One of the gravest consequences of this ranking culture is the growing mental health crisis among students. According to the National Crime Records Bureau (NCRB) Accidental Deaths and Suicides in India Report 2022, more than 13,000 student suicides were reported in a single year in India, reflecting a sharp rise linked to examination pressure, academic anxiety, and fear of failure.
The situation in Kota, India’s coaching hub for JEE and NEET aspirants, has become a national concern. Reports indicate that dozens of students preparing for competitive examinations have died by suicide in recent years due to stress, isolation, and overwhelming academic pressure. These incidents reveal how deeply society has connected marks with personal worth.
A study by the World Health Organization (WHO) also highlights that academic stress remains one of the major contributors to adolescent anxiety and depression globally. In India, students are frequently compared with peers and relatives, creating an environment where failure is treated not as a learning experience but as social humiliation. This constant pressure normalizes burnout among teenagers even before they enter professional life.
Rote Learning and the Collapse of Conceptual Understanding
The obsession with ranks has also strengthened the culture of rote learning. Instead of encouraging curiosity and practical understanding, the system often rewards memorization. The Annual Status of Education Report (ASER) 2023 published by Pratham Foundation found that a significant percentage of students in higher grades still struggle with foundational reading and arithmetic skills despite continuously progressing through the education system.
For instance, ASER reports repeatedly show that many students in Grade 5 cannot comfortably read a Grade 2 level text or solve basic arithmetic problems. This exposes a critical flaw in the education system: students are trained to clear examinations rather than truly understand concepts.
A child may memorize the process of photosynthesis or constitutional definitions for exams, but may struggle to explain their real-world application. Schools often prioritize syllabus completion and test preparation instead of encouraging questioning, experimentation, and conceptual learning.
The Skill Gap and India’s Employability Challenge
India today possesses one of the world’s largest youth populations, often described as a major demographic dividend. However, this demographic advantage risks turning into a crisis if the education system continues prioritizing marks over skills.
According to the India Skills Report 2024, only around 50 percent of Indian graduates are considered employable in terms of industry-relevant skills. Similarly, reports by the World Economic Forum have repeatedly highlighted that employers increasingly value problem-solving abilities, adaptability, communication skills, digital literacy, and critical thinking more than examination scores alone.
This has created a paradox where many graduates possess degrees and ranks but lack practical workplace abilities. Students who excel in creativity, entrepreneurship, leadership, sports, or innovation are often undervalued because the system rewards only numerical academic performance.
The NEET Debate and Educational Inequality
The debate surrounding NEET also reflects how rank-centric systems can deepen educational inequality. Students from metropolitan cities often have access to expensive coaching institutes, digital learning platforms, mentorship, and advanced study material. In contrast, students from rural and economically weaker backgrounds frequently lack similar opportunities.
A report by the NITI Aayog School Education Quality Index highlighted the persistent educational disparities between urban and rural regions in terms of learning outcomes and infrastructure. This creates a form of geographical isolation, where access to educational opportunity becomes dependent not just on talent, but also on location and affordability.
The growing commercialization of coaching culture has intensified this divide further. In many cases, success in competitive examinations increasingly depends on access to private coaching ecosystems rather than school education itself. As a result, students spend years chasing ranks instead of developing broader intellectual or practical capabilities.
The Colonial Legacy of Examination Culture
India’s examination-driven system also has deep historical roots. During colonial rule, the British education structure was designed primarily to produce clerical manpower and administrative workers rather than innovators or entrepreneurs. The focus remained on discipline, memorization, and examination performance.
Even today, traces of that colonial framework continue to exist. Students are often trained to become job seekers rather than employment creators. Subjects that encourage imagination, creativity, critical discussion, and innovation frequently receive less importance compared to rank-producing disciplines.
This excessive dependence on standardized examinations has limited the growth of experiential learning, vocational exposure, and entrepreneurship-oriented education.
Examples That Prioritize Learning Over Ranks
Several countries have adopted educational approaches that reduce excessive academic pressure while maintaining strong learning outcomes. Finland, for example, emphasizes conceptual understanding, collaborative learning, minimal standardized testing, and student well-being. Similarly, Singapore has gradually shifted toward applied learning and reduced dependence on purely examination-based assessment systems.
These models demonstrate that educational excellence does not require a culture dominated entirely by fear, comparison, and rank obsession. Strong education systems are those that balance academics with emotional resilience, creativity, collaboration, and practical skills.
Redefining Success Beyond Numbers
The solution does not lie in eliminating examinations entirely, but in redefining success itself. Education systems must focus on holistic development, encouraging project-based learning, internships, skill development, interdisciplinary exposure, and experiential education alongside academics.
Parents, schools, and society must recognize that a student’s worth cannot be reduced to a percentage or rank sheet. Every child learns differently, and intelligence cannot always be measured through standardized examinations.
At its core, education should prepare students not merely to clear exams, but to navigate life with confidence, empathy, creativity, and purpose.
A story often associated with Thomas Edison reflects this reality. As a child, Edison was once considered academically weak by conventional standards. Yet the same individual later transformed the world through innovation and creativity. History repeatedly reminds us that while ranks may measure examination performance, they cannot fully measure imagination, resilience, leadership, or human potential.
Sometimes, the students who score the highest marks succeed within the system. But the students who learn beyond the system often change the world.
Click Here for More Educational Column